{"id":16558,"date":"2021-12-14T17:00:11","date_gmt":"2021-12-14T17:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/?page_id=16558"},"modified":"2021-12-21T15:53:30","modified_gmt":"2021-12-21T15:53:30","slug":"dispute-between-dr-rath-and-the-dutch-government-on-compulsory-vaccination-and-boosters","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/dispute-between-dr-rath-and-the-dutch-government-on-compulsory-vaccination-and-boosters\/","title":{"rendered":"Dispute between Dr. Rath and the Dutch government on compulsory vaccination and boosters"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”16622″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]To<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mr. Mark Rutte
\nPrime Minister, The Netherlands
\nDen Haag \/ The Hague[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]CC<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hugo de Jonge, Dutch Health Minister Government of the Netherlands[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/3″ css=”.vc_custom_1639739770314{background-color: #f7f7f7 !important;}”][vc_column_text]Timeline<\/strong><\/p>\n

November 11, 2021<\/em>
\nOur emergency letter<\/a><\/p>\n

December 2, 2021<\/em>
\nResponse from Rutte Office<\/a><\/p>\n

December 14, 2021<\/em>
\nOur Response (staat op deze pagina)<\/p>\n

December 14, 2021<\/em>
\nFact Sheet<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][\/vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Heerlen, 14 December 2021<\/p>\n

Dear Mr. Rutte,<\/p>\n

Thank you for your response dated December 2, 2021 [1<\/strong><\/a>], in which your office answers my Emergency Letter of November 12. In that Open Letter I called upon you to immediately stop any plans for mandatory vaccination with RNA\/DNA anti-COVID-19 vaccines. This public warning became necessary in light of new scientific data about the potential short- and long-term damage these vaccines cause in the biological software (DNA) of millions of vaccinated people [Jiang et al, Viruses, 2021, 13, 2056 | 2<\/strong><\/a>].<\/p>\n

Over the past weeks, support for this Open Letter has reached your government from many Dutch citizens who felt that, from a science point of view, its contents expressed their very own concerns about the risk of these vaccines. The nationwide circulation of this scientific information has, no doubt, contributed to the decision of the Dutch government [3<\/strong><\/a>] earlier this week to not impose any further steps towards mandatory vaccination with these potentially unsafe vaccines.<\/p>\n

But this is not enough. In order to categorically exclude any large-scale future health risks for millions of Dutch citizens, I consider it the responsibility of your government to immediately inform the people of the Netherlands about the newly discovered and potentially far-reaching safety concerns of these RNA\/DNA-based anti-COVID-19 vaccines.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Dutch Government does not know the facts<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is noteworthy that these potentially grave and wide-spread health risks were not published by the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture these vaccines \u2013 but by independent scientists. Even after these alarming scientific findings were published, the manufacturers of these related RNA\/DNA vaccines still failed to issue a public warning cautioning against their further use due to serious health concerns. Worse, the vaccine producers left the governments they advise \u2013 including your own \u2013 apparently \u2018in the dark\u2018 about these potentially serious and widespread side effects.<\/p>\n

Such irresponsible conduct leaves severe doubt as to the advice these companies have been providing to your government, as well as to the information they have released to the public in the past.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, your response letter to me of December 2 demonstrates that neither you nor your government have fully understood the potentially far-reaching and long-term side effects of RNA\/DNA-based anti-COVID-19 vaccines \u2013 or worse, were misguided by vaccine manufacturers.<\/p>\n

In your response letter you essentially echo the narrative of these pharmaceutical companies by simply negating the health risks of their RNA\/DNA vaccines. In light of the new scientific facts about potentially serious side-effects, you thereby risk undermining the credibility of your entire government and its commitment to protect first and foremost the health interests of the Dutch people. What will the people of the Netherlands think when they watch further advocacy for these potentially harmful vaccines by you and Mr. de Jonge on national TV during forthcoming press conferences?<\/p>\n

In order to empower the people of the Netherlands and your government to take responsible public health decisions towards ending the pandemic, and to prevent long-term health damage to the Dutch people, I decided to address in detail the arguments you make in your response letter in the attached Fact Sheet [4<\/u><\/strong><\/a>].<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Dutch Government makes rules and laws based on misguided scientific information<\/strong><\/p>\n

Should the Dutch government continue to promote RNA\/DNA-based anti-COVID-19 vaccines as the \u2018only way\u2019 to end the coronavirus pandemic, it is misleading the Dutch people. Even the World Health Organization (WHO) [5<\/strong><\/a>] is warning that the millions of people who are already vaccinated should not develop a \u201cfalse sense of security\u201d that such vaccinations will have protected them against further COVID-19 infections. The WHO, thereby, communicates that vaccinated persons can not only be infected by coronaviruses despite being vaccinated \u2013 but can also serve as further transmitters of this pandemic disease.<\/p>\n

Another \u2018justification\u2019 for the further promotion of potentially harmful RNA\/DNA-based vaccines is the argument that there are no alternatives available in the fight against the pandemic. This statement is misleading too. Effective and much safer approaches to help fight the COVID-19 pandemic are readily available and include vaccination with dead (attenuated) coronaviruses, monoclonal antibodies, science-based micronutrients, and others. Many of these approaches should be offered immediately as effective and safe alternatives to risky vaccines.<\/p>\n

Another widespread argument by which the proponents of RNA\/DNA vaccines are trying to convince their citizens to accept such vaccinations is by referring to mandatory vaccination drives in more populated neighboring countries, e.g. Germany. A larger population, however, is not the only characteristic of this country \u2013 it is also the world\u2019s largest exporter of pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines and one of the greatest financial beneficiaries of the global business with RNA-based vaccines.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The responsibility of the Dutch Government in this situation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mr. Rutte, I trust that the public scientific discourse we started about the incalculable risks associated with RNA\/DNA anti-COVID-19 vaccines will strengthen the voices of reason within Dutch society and within your government. This public scientific dialogue must aim at halting any further use of the current vaccine drives with RNA\/DNA-based vaccines \u2013 and any recommendations for so-called \u2018booster\u2019 vaccinations \u2013 until the severe health concerns now associated with these gene-based vaccines have been indisputably resolved by independent scientists who are outside the influence of vaccine manufacturers and their \u2018experts\u2019.<\/p>\n

My correspondence with you and your government is guided by respect for your office and for the responsibility you carry. We share the task to resolve this matter also in the interests of an increasing number of people who have already been harmed by receiving RNA\/DNA-based anti-COVID-19 vaccines \u2013 as well as of those who could be harmed in the future if no decisive measures to stop such vaccinations are taken now.<\/p>\n

Respectfully,<\/p>\n

Dr. M. Rath[\/vc_column_text][vc_separator][vc_column_text]References:<\/strong><\/p>\n

[1<\/strong>] \u00a0\u00a0 https:\/\/www.dr-rath-education.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/answer-prime-minister-rutte-2-dec-2021.pdf<\/a>
\n[2<\/strong>] \u00a0\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/v13102056<\/a>
\n[3<\/strong>] \u00a0\u00a0 https:\/\/www.nu.nl\/coronavirus\/6171622\/kabinet-zet-de-omstreden-2g-maatregel-in-de-ijskast.html<\/a>
\n[4<\/strong>]\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 https:\/\/www.dr-rath-education.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/factsheet-december-2021.pdf<\/a>
\n[5<\/strong>] \u00a0\u00a0 https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/europe\/false-sense-security-around-vaccines-europe-again-covid-epicentre-who-2021-11-24\/<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][vc_separator][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_section][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”16622″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]To Mr. Mark Rutte Prime Minister, The Netherlands Den Haag \/ The Hague[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]CC Hugo de Jonge, Dutch Health Minister Government of the Netherlands[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/3″ css=”.vc_custom_1639739770314{background-color: #f7f7f7 !important;}”][vc_column_text]Timeline November 11, 2021 Our emergency letter December 2, 2021 Response from Rutte Office December 14, 2021 Our Response (staat op deze pagina) December 14, 2021…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/16558"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16558"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/16558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17297,"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/16558\/revisions\/17297"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/voteforreason.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}