Call to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres by Dr. Matthias Rath
Call to the people and governments of the world

Let’s Build a ‘World Without Disease’ – Now!

This Open Letter to inform the UN and the world about the following facts:

• A scientific breakthrough to end the current pandemic by using effective, safe and affordable natural health approaches

• A global public-health strategy to prevent pharmaceutical colonialism and, thereby, to protect the efforts of the United
Nations towards global equality

• A strategic plan ‘Towards a World Without Disease’, based on natural health education and plant-derived medicine

Matthias Rath, M.D.

Antonio Guterres

Who we are

I am the founder of an independent non-profit research institute operating in the field of medical science. Our team of senior scientists and medical doctors worked together with the late two-time Noble Laureate Linus Pauling. Dr. Pauling was one of the most distinguished scientists of the 20th century. His discoveries included principles of immunology, the basic structures of proteins, as well as the first identified genetic disease, sickle cell anemia. In his later years, Dr. Pauling became interested in the role of micronutrients in the fight against diseases, including the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other viral diseases.

Over the past two decades, our research team has continued this ground-breaking work in science-based natural health. Our foundation has been promoting natural health education programs for schools and the general public in many parts of the world, including developing countries. Our Research Institute, under the leadership of Dr. Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, has validated specific micronutrients in the fight against many human diseases and has recently pioneered effective science-based approaches towards the natural control of the coronavirus pandemic.

WHY I AM ADDRESSING YOU, THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Considering the rapid rate of coronavirus mutations, our work has significance for the entire world, since it shows an effective way to inhibit coronavirus irrespective of subtypes and mutations.

Moreover, the people of the world are alarmed by an increased occurrence of severe health complications that have occurred in connection with some gene-based vaccines. In this situation, it is imperative that the United Nations, as well as the international community at large, makes the search for a safe and globally accepted response to the pandemic an absolute priority.

With this letter I am officially informing you, as UN Secretary-General, and through you the entire UN-organization about this new – and possibly only – effective, safe and globally applicable approach to end the current pandemic. I will revert to details of this groundbreaking research in the following paragraphs of my letter.

Another reason why I am addressing you is the fact that in a recent speech to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC), you as UN Secretary-General expressed concerns and alerted the world to the following facts:

2. Feeding corporate greed of pharmaceutical companies under the ‘pretext’ of fighting the pandemic

In your address to the Human Rights Council, you further stated:

Using the pandemic as a pretext, authorities in some countries have deployed heavy-handed security responses and emergency measures … A vast library of information is being assembled about each of us … That data is being used commercially — for advertising, for marketing and for beefing up corporate bottom lines.” 

While your speech correctly criticized the global abuse of the coronavirus pandemic by corporations and governments, it failed to specifically name those interests that are planning to tighten their grip on our planet – the pharmaceutical multinational companies.

Without providing a clear analysis of this corporate strategy and without outlining its devastating global consequences to the people of the world, it will not be possible to stop this fateful development. The people of the world deserve to be informed about these malicious plans for corporate control on a global scale. The only way to derail such plans and to prevent their eventual implementation is to expose them to the world in broad daylight. You, Mr. Guterres, share this responsibility and the facts contained in this letter are marshaled for the same reasons.

3. Ending pharmaceutical colonialism – the most malicious form of neo-colonialism.

In an earlier address to the UN Human Rights Council, you made the battle against all forms of colonialism a personal issue by stating:

“I grew up under the Salazar dictatorship in Portugal. I did not know democracy until I was twenty-four years old. I came of age seeing how the denial of not just civil and political rights – but also social, cultural, and economic rights – corroded every aspect of society. It condemned many to a life of poverty… And I saw the dictatorship oppressing not only its own citizens, but also the people of the African colonies, including by waging wars for 13 long and bloody years.”

While open colonialism of earlier centuries has been largely replaced by new types of colonialism, these less overt forms of neo-colonialism have the same devastating consequences for the people living under such conditions. The most malicious form of neo-colonialism is pharmaceutical colonialism since it creates physical and economic dependency behind a false promise of help.

A pandemic caused by a rapidly mutating virus, such as the coronavirus, poses a fantastic business opportunity for a pharmaceutical multinational to ‘beef up corporate bottom lines’. Worse, it is also the most heinous strategy for the leading pharmaceutical export nations – a handful of the richest economies on our planet – to systematically cement and extend a growing economic dependency to the almost 200 less-fortunate countries.

Current strategies to fight the coronavirus pandemic focus solely on vaccines – potentially requiring the development of new vaccines for essentially every new mutation of the virus. In the light of dozens, or even hundreds, of such coronavirus mutations likely to occur in the coming years, it is obvious that global health strategies based only on vaccines are a dead end. While wealthy nations may be able to cope with this challenge for some time, such a shortsighted strategy spells human and economic disaster for the great majority of developing and threshold nations. Any denial of this sobering analysis will inevitably pave the way for this catastrophe to occur. The scale of this global disaster will eliminate essentially all progress towards a better and more equal world that the United Nations has achieved over decades.

The only way for humankind to escape such a tragedy is to initiate a new global health strategy that is effective, safe, sustainable, and, above all, that provides the scientific basis to prevent all forms of coronavirus infections, irrespective of subtype and mutation.

The scientific basis for such a universal health strategy is now available and can be implemented anywhere in the world immediately.

The preconditions for the development of coronavirus infections into a global pandemic.

You stated: “The virus has thrived because poverty, discrimination, the destruction of our natural environment and other human rights failures have created enormous fragilities in our societies.”

While your list of factors contributing to the pandemic is correct, it is not complete. In fact, the most important precondition for coronavirus infections to turn into a devastating pandemic is yet another underlying ‘pandemic’: for decades now, a deficiency in the daily intake of vitamins and other micronutrients has been weakening the immune system of billions of people on our planet and has made their bodies susceptible to viral infections and other diseases.

Our research underscores this connection: if micronutrients are able to block the pathway of infection of coronaviruses, then – based on the laws of biology and medicine – a deficiency of these micronutrients creates the precondition for an increased susceptibility in the global population to this viral infection.

It is surprising that you could have missed this important connection despite the following well-established facts:

  1. No fewer than nine Nobel Prizes have been awarded for the discovery of the role of vitamins for human health, the majority of which are in connection with the importance of these plant-derived molecules in strengthening the immune system and protecting the human body against viral and other infections.
  2. As of today, more than 100,000 scientific publications are available through online medical libraries such as PubMed under the search terms of ‘vitamins’ in combination with ‘immune system/function’.
  3. UN organizations have, in the past, repeatedly alerted the world to the global health consequences of widespread micronutrient deficiencies. For example, the global Vitamin and Mineral Deficiency (VMD) initiative – supported by the UN’s children’s organization UNICEF – drew attention to the fact that one third of the world’s population was suffering from chronic vitamin and mineral deficiency, thereby increasing the susceptibility to infections and other diseases on a global scale.

2. Feeding corporate greed of pharmaceutical companies under the ‘pretext’ of fighting the pandemic

In your address to the Human Rights Council, you further stated:

Using the pandemic as a pretext, authorities in some countries have deployed heavy-handed security responses and emergency measures … A vast library of information is being assembled about each of us … That data is being used commercially — for advertising, for marketing and for beefing up corporate bottom lines.” 

While your speech correctly criticized the global abuse of the coronavirus pandemic by corporations and governments, it failed to specifically name those interests that are planning to tighten their grip on our planet – the pharmaceutical multinational companies.

Without providing a clear analysis of this corporate strategy and without outlining its devastating global consequences to the people of the world, it will not be possible to stop this fateful development. The people of the world deserve to be informed about these malicious plans for corporate control on a global scale. The only way to derail such plans and to prevent their eventual implementation is to expose them to the world in broad daylight. You, Mr. Guterres, share this responsibility and the facts contained in this letter are marshaled for the same reasons.

3. Ending pharmaceutical colonialism – the most malicious form of neo-colonialism.

In an earlier address to the UN Human Rights Council, you made the battle against all forms of colonialism a personal issue by stating:

“I grew up under the Salazar dictatorship in Portugal. I did not know democracy until I was twenty-four years old. I came of age seeing how the denial of not just civil and political rights – but also social, cultural, and economic rights – corroded every aspect of society. It condemned many to a life of poverty… And I saw the dictatorship oppressing not only its own citizens, but also the people of the African colonies, including by waging wars for 13 long and bloody years.”

While open colonialism of earlier centuries has been largely replaced by new types of colonialism, these less overt forms of neo-colonialism have the same devastating consequences for the people living under such conditions. The most malicious form of neo-colonialism is pharmaceutical colonialism since it creates physical and economic dependency behind a false promise of help.

A pandemic caused by a rapidly mutating virus, such as the coronavirus, poses a fantastic business opportunity for a pharmaceutical multinational to ‘beef up corporate bottom lines’. Worse, it is also the most heinous strategy for the leading pharmaceutical export nations – a handful of the richest economies on our planet – to systematically cement and extend a growing economic dependency to the almost 200 less-fortunate countries.

Current strategies to fight the coronavirus pandemic focus solely on vaccines – potentially requiring the development of new vaccines for essentially every new mutation of the virus. In the light of dozens, or even hundreds, of such coronavirus mutations likely to occur in the coming years, it is obvious that global health strategies based only on vaccines are a dead end. While wealthy nations may be able to cope with this challenge for some time, such a shortsighted strategy spells human and economic disaster for the great majority of developing and threshold nations. Any denial of this sobering analysis will inevitably pave the way for this catastrophe to occur. The scale of this global disaster will eliminate essentially all progress towards a better and more equal world that the United Nations has achieved over decades.

The only way for humankind to escape such a tragedy is to initiate a new global health strategy that is effective, safe, sustainable, and, above all, that provides the scientific basis to prevent all forms of coronavirus infections, irrespective of subtype and mutation.

The scientific basis for such a universal health strategy is now available and can be implemented anywhere in the world immediately.

Micronutrients inhibit key infection mechanisms used by all coronavirus mutations

Since the beginning of the current pandemic, the international research community has been focusing on developing a vaccine that is able to block the binding of the coronavirus to the viral ‘anchor’ and ‘entry door’ on the surface of human cells – the ACE2 receptor – via which the virus infects the human body.

Thus, our research team chose a scientific approach that promises to protect the people of the world against potentially all coronavirus mutations – current and future. In order to accomplish this goal, we had to identify

  1. The common pathways via which all subtypes/mutations of the coronavirus infect the cells of the body.
  2. The defense mechanisms via which human cells can protect themselves against attacks from any type of coronavirus.
  3. The biological molecules that regulate these defense processes and can help to protect against all coronavirus subtypes/mutations.

It is a scientific fact that all known coronaviruses use the same entry door (the ACE 2 receptor) to infect the body. Thus, our first approach was to find a way to reduce the production/expression of the ACE2 cell surface receptors. We found that a specific combination of vitamins and other micronutrients was able to significantly inhibit (down-regulate) the expression of these viral receptors as well as to inhibit other key mechanisms of coronavirus infections.

There is only one category of molecules that can accomplish the task of regulating cellular metabolism in such a way as to down-regulate the production of cellular structures required for coronavirus infection (ACE2 receptors), as well as to curb the machinery of biological catalysts (enzymes) that are hijacked by the virus in order to replicate within human cells. These regulatory molecules are known as micronutrients and include vitamins, minerals, and certain other natural substances.

Our comprehensive research studies have determined the most effective bioactive molecules in the defense against the coronavirus infection of human cells. Our research established that these natural molecules were most effective in interfering with key mechanisms of coronavirus infections when used in specific combinations that enable the individual components to interact synergistically.

Specific micronutrient combinations are able to significantly inhibit all known key mechanisms of coronavirus infections simultaneously, including:

  1. The significant inhibition of the binding of coronavirus surface proteins (spikes) to ACE2 receptors on the surface of human cells.
  2. The significant inhibition of the production of ACE2 receptors by human cells, thereby limiting the binding of coronaviruses to these cells and their chances of infection.
  3. The significant inhibition of all key proteins (enzymes) involved in the uptake as well as multiplication of coronaviruses inside human cells.
  4. A significant increase in general immune-system function, including the production of immune defense cells (leukocytes), their ability to migrate to the site of infection (chemotaxis), and the removal of viruses and other infective invaders (phagocytosis).

The superiority of this new focus on enhancing the protection of human cells against all coronavirus mutations – compared with vaccine strategies focusing only on one coronavirus subtype – is so obvious that it can be understood even by a teenage student. The compelling scientific logic behind this new global health strategy is summarized in the following health information that can be used in schools around the world.

This health information page summarizes the scientific breakthrough in natural health towards the control of the coronavirus pandemic. It should be forwarded by the UN to every member state for worldwide distribution.

Moreover, this potentially life-saving information can be downloaded by anyone, anywhere in the world, to be posted in homes, schools, other educational institutions, hospitals, doctors’ offices, in stores and factories.

The scientific details of this comprehensive research have been published in peer-reviewed and other scientific journals, and are publicly accessible via the website of our research Institute at https://drrathresearch.org/.

This groundbreaking research is further validated by the first clinical study demonstrating that high-dose vitamin C is able not just to prevent coronavirus infections, but also to halve the death rate (mortality) of severely infected, hospitalized coronavirus patients – an effect not documented for any of the current vaccines or pharmaceutical drugs.

On behalf of our entire research team, I am informing you, as Secretary-General, the entire United Nations organization, as well as the political decision takers and the people of the world about this scientific breakthrough.

In the light of the explosion of coronavirus mutations – and the growing safety concerns about the available vaccines – this scientific advance is a beacon of hope for humanity. It calls for a global campaign uniting all mankind in an effort to end the coronavirus pandemic once and for all.

Our research team is willing to share our entire know-how free of charge with any public organization anywhere in the world.

Global consequences of these discoveries

The most important global consequences of this scientific breakthrough include the following:

a. New, effective, science-based and safe health approaches are immediately available

Humankind now has a science-based and safe approach available to fight the current coronavirus pandemic and to minimize the danger of new waves caused by mutations of the virus.

The implementation of this new approach in the global fight against the coronavirus pandemic calls for the involvement of all people and organizations throughout the world to participate, in order to end this pandemic as soon as possible.

From now on, any assertion by vaccine manufacturers – or through their lobbyists in politics, the media and medicine – that vaccines are the only way to combat the coronavirus pandemic is no longer valid. Accordingly, no citizen anywhere in the world should be forced to be vaccinated with the false argument that there are no other means available to protect the human body against coronavirus infections.

From today onwards, any politician making such unsustainable assertions is doing so contrary to established scientific facts. Anyone who chooses to publicly deny these scientific facts may be held responsible for his or her actions by the people they harmed.

b. Global micronutrient deficiency identified as a primary cause for the current pandemic

Our research has established unequivocally that micronutrients are able to inhibit all key mechanisms of coronavirus infections. Based on the laws of biology and medicine, this means that, in turn, widespread micronutrient deficiencies have been a precondition and contributing factor for the coronavirus pandemic to occur.

In turn, this means that any corporation, politician, scientist, doctor – or just anyone – who has been involved in publicly

  1. questioning or even discrediting the health benefits of micronutrients,
  2. discouraging an optimum intake of micronutrients,
  3. advocating arbitrarily low and insufficient upper limits of daily micronutrient intake,
  4. banning through regulation or legislation health claims made in connection with micronutrients and other science-based natural health approaches,

has directly or indirectly contributed to the emergence of the current coronavirus pandemic. They, therefore, share responsibility for the physical, economic and social consequences of this human disaster – and can be held responsible in national and international courts of law for their actions.

The consequences of this sobering analysis are far reaching and call for a more detailed look into the background of the current global crisis.

The pharmaceutical investment business – the greatest obstacle to health for all

History teaches us that the only way for humankind to avoid repeating its darkest hours is to have a better awareness of its own past. In order to understand the current global crisis – and the deliberate neglect of science-based natural health approaches as part of the solution – the governments and people of the world should be aware of the following facts:

1. The business model of the pharmaceutical investment business

In European, America and many Asian countries, health care is largely dominated by the influence of giant private interests, namely the pharmaceutical investment industry.

While this industry parades itself as the purveyor of modern medicine and healthcare worldwide, a closer look at its business model provides a quite different perspective:

The laws of the pharmaceutical industry

  1. The pharmaceutical industry is not primarily a health industry but an investment business, being
    ultimately responsible only to its shareholders.
  2. The marketplaces for this multi-trillion-dollar investment industry are existing diseases. Its business strategy is to extend these disease markets – and thereby diseases themselves – globally.
  3. The merchandise driving this industry is patented synthetic drugs, with exorbitant patent fees
    determining the ‘return on investment’ for this entire industry.
  4. The prevention and eradication of diseases threatens to destroy the multi-billion-dollar markets
    for patented drugs.
  5. Effective, natural health approaches, including micronutrient therapies are non-patentable. They, therefore, threaten the very basis of the pharmaceutical investment business with patented drugs.
  6. Thus, from this industry’s inception more than a century ago, an army of lobbyists in medicine,the media and politics has been fighting the implementation of lifesaving natural health solutions into medicine and public-health policies around the world.

As a consequence, billions of people worldwide suffer from chronic micronutrient deficiencies. As we shall see, this has resulted in widespread immune deficiencies and become a precondition for the development of the current pandemic.

A more detailed history of the pharmaceutical investment business – on both sides of the Atlantic – is documented in history books as well as in online reviews.

Before I revert to the current situation, it is necessary to have a closer look at the business strategy of the pharmaceutical investment business over the past century and to examine its major corporate and governmental stakeholders.

2. Suppressing natural-health information as a precondition for the development of the patented drug business into a multi-trillion-dollar investment industry

The prerequisite for the growth of the pharmaceutical industry into a multi-trillion-dollar investment business over the past century has been the systematic suppression of nonpatentable natural health approaches. This included the banning of natural health information and the setting of arbitrarily low ‘maximum daily levels’ for micronutrients in supplements. This, in turn, suppressed natural health research, eliminated lifesaving natural health education from medical schools and prevented its dissemination to the public at large.

The culmination of these efforts was a coordinated effort to implement a global ban on micronutrient-based and other natural therapies by the so-called Codex Alimentarius commission, coordinated by the German government and given a pseudo-legitimate image via the participation of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.

We, therefore, have to address the following question: why is it that the government of Germany – of all countries – has been trying to coordinate the global suppression of natural health information for more than half a century now?

Germany – the world’s largest pharmaceutical export nation

For several decades, Germany has been the world’s leading export nation of pharmaceutical products. Today, it is still in first place, accounting for about 20 percent of all global drug exports. Starting in the 1860’s, three pharmaceutical giants evolved, BAYER, BASF and HOECHST (today a subsidiary of France’s Sanofi-Aventis group), which by the beginning of the 20th century already owned tens of thousands of patents on newly synthesized drugs and chemicals.

The process of patenting made these chemical/pharmaceutical companies the owners of the synthetic molecules they produced. Most of these molecules were actually modeled after natural molecules and only slightly modified in their structure – in order to be able to patent them. This trick of ‘patenting nature’ gave the corporate owners of these patents a ‘God-like’ status – a fact they wasted no time in proclaiming to the world by naming its supervisory board the ‘Council of the Gods’.

To rule the world, these corporations decided to expand the German patent law first to other European countries, and ultimately to the rest of the world. The fastest way to achieve this goal was by military conquest, followed by the takeover of the German legal and administrative system in the conquered countries. Towards this end, in 1914, they commissioned the German Emperor to launch World War I – and supplied him with all war-essential materials, including chemical warfare agents (mustard gas and others).

In 1925, after the first attempt at world conquest, WWI, had failed, these same chemical/ pharmaceutical companies formed the infamous IG Farben cartel to better coordinate their next attempt at world conquest. Towards this end BAYER, BASF and other IG Farben members became the main corporate sponsor of the rise to power of the German Nazi party. As the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal subsequently documented, they supplied – just as in World War I – 100 percent of the explosives (TNT), gasoline, rubber and other essential war materials for the military conquest launched by Germany. In return for this ‘investment’, the IG Farben companies became the new owners of all major industries in the countries conquered through their coalition with the German army.

In the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, Case No. VI), two dozen executives of BAYER and BASF were sentenced for mass murder, slavery, spoliation and other crimes against humanity. The US prosecutors in this historic trial concluded that without IG Farben World War II would not have been possible.

The Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal also documented, that BAYER and the other IG Farben companies had abused innocent inmates of Auschwitz and other German concentration camps as human guinea pigs in order to test their newly synthesized patented drugs. Pictures of these drugs, including their corporate logos, were official exhibits against IG Farben at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal.

The documents lay bare the overlapping corporate and political interests. The US prosecutors in Nuremberg described the close relationship between IG Farben and the Nazi government as an ‘alliance’, ‘marriage’ and similar terms. Moreover, the records of the Nuremberg tribunal established that essentially the corporate subsidiaries of BAYER and other IG Farben companies in more than 100 countries of the world served as strategic centers to plan and assist in the conduct of this military world conquest.

In his opening statement against IG Farben at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, US chief prosecutor Telford Taylor left no doubt that the German chemical/pharmaceutical multinationals were the driving force behind the rise of the Nazi party and World War II as an attempt at world conquest:

‘Their [these companies] purpose was to turn the German nation into a military machine and build it into an engine of destruction so terrifyingly formidable that Germany could, by brutal threats and, if necessary, by war, impose her will and her dominion on Europe, and, later, on other nations beyond the seas.’

Moreover, to coordinate the preparations for world conquest with the Nazi government, IG Farben maintained a giant ‘connection office’ in Berlin, code named ‘Berlin Northwest 7’. Details of the work of this corporate/military coordination are documented in the records of the War Crimes Tribunal case against IG Farben.

Following its defeat in World War II, Germany – under Allied administration – received a democratic constitution. Significantly, however, for the decisive first decades of the new Federal Republic, many of its political decision takers had previously served the Nazi/IG Farben attempt at world conquest. Hans Globke – during the Third Reich senior administrator of occupied countries and co-author of the infamous German Racial Laws – became a key architect of the ‘new Germany’ as first head of the chancellery responsible for all executive regulations of the West-German constitution.  Walter Hallstein – who, during the Nazi years, had been a key planner of the new legal and administration system in countries conquered by the Nazi/IG Farben coalition – became the chief architect of German foreign policy and a ‘founding father’ of the European Economic Community, the precursor of today’s European Union in Brussels.

But these individuals were just the tips of the iceberg. The entire administration of political, social and even the military sectors of the newly founded Federal Republic of Germany was penetrated by an ‘old elite’ – that had escaped all denazification efforts. Together they made sure that, behind a new veil of democracy, the old corporate interests of the German chemical/pharmaceutical industry flourished, and prepared for their next attempt at world conquest.

A precondition for this strategy to succeed was, of course, that the criminal past of the German chemical pharmaceutical industry behind two world wars had to be systematically banned from the textbooks of history and the common memory of humanity. Towards this goal, the new political stakeholders of these corporate interests spent billions to reinterpret World War II as primarily a racial war – thereby deliberately hiding the role of IG Farben as the driving economic force of this war.

Appeal for Multilateral Cooperation for Global Recovery

Politicians already representing three quarters of the world’s pharmaceutical drug exports address the world in favor of more drug exports. From left: Emmanuel Macron (France), Ursula von der Leyen (EU), Charles Michel (Belgium) and, at far right, Angela Merkel (Germany). Senegal President Macky Sall and yourself, as the UN Secretary-General, could barely mask the economic interests of this ‘Appeal’. Source: UN, February 2021.

The only explanation as to why you, as the highest representative of the United Nations could put your name to a document that – no doubt – will be abused to promote pharmaceutical colonialism, is that you were made to believe by some so-called ‘experts’ that vaccines are the only science-based way to end the pandemic.

However, and as our research documents unequivocally proves, this statement can no longer be upheld. From now on, anyone trying to make the people believe in a ‘vaccine-only’ strategy is spreading ‘fake news’ and is not acting in the interests of the people of the world – they are instead simply supporting pharmaceutical colonialism.

b. The laws of pharmaceutical colonialism

The principles of pharmaceutical colonialism are as easy to understand as the above-mentioned laws of the ‘pharmaceutical investment business’:

  1. Pharmaceutical colonialism is the most heinous form of colonialism, because it hides behind the deceptive veal of ‘charity’ – i.e., wealthy pharmaceutical export nations portraying themselves as ‘helping’ people living in poor countries.
  2. The opposite is true. The export of patented drugs to the developing world has little or no effect on the most widespread and urgent health problems it faces, such as malnutrition, immune deficiencies triggering susceptibility to infectious diseases, and other nutritional deficiency-related diseases.
  3. While the health benefits of the multi-billion-dollar drug exports to the developing world are limited, they have clear long-term economic and social consequences: they systematically drain the already scarce economic resources of these countries and deprive them of the opportunity of economic development and of a dignified life for its people.
  4. A network of lobbyists in the media, medicine and politics plays an essential role in this strategy by deceptively portraying ‘Western’ medicine as the only science-based form of health care. This prevents hundreds of millions of people in these countries from being able to take advantage of the benefits of natural and agricultural-based health approaches.

c. The consequences of pharmaceutical colonialism

While these principles of pharmaceutical colonialism may sound abstract to some, their consequences are obvious.

Put yourself in the shoes…

of a major shareholder or executive of a pharmaceutical multinational. You just learnt that a rapidly mutating virus, the coronavirus, is threatening the health of people in essentially every country of the world. But you also know that with every new virus mutation a new specific vaccine will become necessary. Your drug company holds the patents to such a vaccine and the sales of this merchandise will inevitably increase your ‘bottom line’.

You realize that you can take advantage of these future mutations by producing a potentially unlimited number of vaccines against them. By making the countries of the world dependent on the pharmaceutical industry in this way, you can gradually drain them economically and, as a consequence, bring many of the poorest nations under your complete control.

There are only a few preconditions for this strategic global ‘takeover’ on behalf of corporate interests in this thought model:

  1. You must use the global media you control to maintain the false belief that vaccines are the only solution to ending the current viral pandemic.
  2. You must eliminate any possibility, that non-patentable health approaches are considered as alternatives, or even substitutes for the promotion of your vaccine merchandise. In particular you must publicly discredit the use of vitamins and other micronutrients.
  3. You must seek support for this unscrupulous global vaccine marketing campaign from reputable national and international institutions and organizations – most notably the United Nations.

At this decisive moment in history, it is above all your responsibility, Mr. Secretary General, to point out to the world the grave dangers of pharmaceutical colonialism and its particularly malicious form, which abuses the current coronavirus pandemic as a ‘pretext’.

In this context, this Open Letter has a particular significance by not just criticizing the status quo – but also offering the only science-based strategy to provide sustainable health in even the poorest countries, and, thus, to avoid a fatal spiral of neo-colonial dependency for the great majority of the world’s population.

d. They have done it before: pharmaceutical colonialism under the pretext of fighting the HIV/AIDS pandemic

This isn’t the first time that global human health has been attacked by pharmaceutical interests under the pretext of fighting a pandemic. One particular well-documented example has been the pandemic of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS).

For more than three decades the lobbyists of the pharmaceutical investment business have misled the world’s political decision-takers – especially in the developing countries hardest hit by the HIV/AIDS pandemic – into believing that the only way to fight it would be to spend billions of dollars to import so-called ‘antiviral drugs’.

Neither the politicians nor the people in the countries affected by this pandemic realized that the term ‘antiviral drug’ was just code for selling toxic chemotherapy drugs in the form of tablets. Labeling these drugs correctly as ‘chemotherapy’ would have resulted in them being rejected, of course, because it is well known that these toxic substances damage and eventually destroy the bone marrow – the very site in the human body were the immune cells (leukocytes) are produced.

With this despicable trick, an army of global lobbyists for the pharmaceutical export business became responsible for tens of millions of people who were already suffering from immune deficiencies being given toxic drugs that, instead of improving their immune system, further weakened it, thereby activating AIDS and shortening their lives.

It was not until 2013, one entire generation after the beginning of the pandemic, that the world learnt how the most effective way to delay the development of the immune deficiency disease AIDS was to ensure an optimum intake of micronutrients. The results of a large-scale clinical epidemiological study were published in November 2013 in the Journal of the American Medical Association and concluded:

“This evidence supports the use of specific micronutrient supplementation as an effective intervention in HIV-infected adults in early stages of HIV disease, significantly reducing the risk for disease progression… This reduced risk may translate into delay in the time when the HIV-infected patients experience immune dysfunction and into broader access to HIV treatment in developing countries.”

But the preventive and therapeutic benefits of micronutrients in the fight against the AIDS pandemic was not the only area of medicine where these natural substances proved to be equally effective compared with patented pharmaceutical drugs or even superior.

‘Brussels EU’ – Global coordinator of today’s pharmaceutical export business

‘Brussels EU’ – Politburo of today’s pharmaceutical export business

For several decades, Germany has been the world’s leading national exporter of pharmaceutical products. Today it is still in first place, account for about 20 percent of all global drug export. Starting in the 1860s, three pharmaceutical

After their second attempt at world conquest, World War II, had failed, the German chemical/pharmaceutical industry and its political stakeholders came up with a new plan of world conquest – this time employing primarily political and economic means. The first step of their new strategy was to establish an economic and political dominance over Europe – and on that basis to make another attempt at corporate world conquest. This was the birth hour of the above-mentioned ‘European Union’ – also known as the ‘Brussels EU’.

Today, the pharmaceutical investment industry has turned the entire European continent into an export hub for soliciting its merchandise to the world. Not surprisingly, the Brussels EU now represents not only the interests of the German pharmaceutical export industry but also the economic and political interests of around three quarters of the world’s pharmaceutical export business. While this organization parades as a ‘beacon of democracy’ on today’s world stage, it operates in the tradition of IG Farben’s WWII coordination office ‘Berlin Northwest 7’, and essentially functions as the political coordinator of today’s global pharmaceutical export businesses.

Particularly disconcerting is the fact that the Brussels EU was conceived and built using the blueprints of a Europe designed by the Nazi/IG Farben coalition – after victory in World War II. This European political construct is run by a group of unelected ‘commissioners’. It uses an army of more than 50,000 bureaucrats, all paid by European taxpayers. This giant corporate/political apparatus – the world’s largest coordination office of corporate interests – hides behind a pseudo-democratic structure, a so-called ‘EU-Parliament’, which lacks even the most basic democratic rights, e.g., the right to initiate legislation.

The chief architect of this construct, who for nine years – following its inception in 1957 – held the post of unelected  President of its Commission – was the above mentioned Walter Hallstein, a German lawyer and politician who escaped his sentencing as a war criminal only by denying his association with the ‘Third Reich’ to the Allied denazification authorities. Hallstein had been an official legal representative of the Nazi state at a decisive conference in Rome in 1938, one year before the start of World War II, where the German and Italian Fascist governments planned the post-war face of Europe under their rule.

Merely two decades later, the very same Walter Hallstein signed the Treaty of Rome, the founding document of today’s European Union, as one of its 12 founding-fathers.

In the spirit of these founding fathers, the Brussels EU today is pursuing the century-old goal of world conquest on behalf of the chemical/pharmaceutical investment business. Towards this end, it presses for so-called ‘free trade agreements’ with other regional organizations such as Mercosur, the African Union and others. Under the pretext of promoting and harmonizing trade, these ‘agreements’ expand the protectionist grip of the pharmaceutical investment business on governments and hundreds of millions of ordinary people worldwide.

Pharmaceutical Colonialisms

It does not take a degree in business or politics to understand that, by representing the economic interests of a multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical export business, the ‘Brussels EU’ is seeking to cement and expand these interests worldwide. Thus, the ‘Brussels EU’ also functions as the global political office for the furthering of pharmaceutical colonialism.

a. On which side does the UN stand?

In February 2021, you, Mr. Guterres, put your name to a document entitled Multilateral Cooperation for Global Recovery22. The other signatories were political representatives of the world’s largest pharmaceutical export nations, among them Angela Merkel (Germany), Emmanuel Macron (France), Charles Michel (Belgium, President of the so-called ‘European Council’), Ursula von der Leyen (Germany, President of the EU-Commission). In this heavily publicized letter, you call for a more rapid distribution of patented vaccines to the developing world. While such a call may be seen by some as support for the people living in the developing world, its list of signatories casts it in an entirely different light. Your name, as UN Secretary-General – alongside the political stakeholders of corporate interests representing three-quarters of the global drug export business – may turn out as yet another abuse of the UN as a credible international organization by these corporate interests.

Appeal for Multilateral Cooperation for Global Recovery

Politicians already representing three quarters of the world’s pharmaceutical drug exports address the world in favor of more drug exports. From left: Emmanuel Macron (France), Ursula von der Leyen (EU), Charles Michel (Belgium) and, at far right, Angela Merkel (Germany). Senegal President Macky Sall and yourself, as the UN Secretary-General, could barely mask the economic interests of this ‘Appeal’. Source: UN, February 2021.

The only explanation as to why you, as the highest representative of the United Nations could put your name to a document that – no doubt – will be abused to promote pharmaceutical colonialism, is that you were made to believe by some so-called ‘experts’ that vaccines are the only science-based way to end the pandemic.

However, and as our research documents unequivocally proves, this statement can no longer be upheld. From now on, anyone trying to make the people believe in a ‘vaccine-only’ strategy is spreading ‘fake news’ and is not acting in the interests of the people of the world – they are instead simply supporting pharmaceutical colonialism.

b. The laws of pharmaceutical colonialism

The principles of pharmaceutical colonialism are as easy to understand as the above-mentioned laws of the ‘pharmaceutical investment business’:

  1. Pharmaceutical colonialism is the most heinous form of colonialism, because it hides behind the deceptive veal of ‘charity’ – i.e., wealthy pharmaceutical export nations portraying themselves as ‘helping’ people living in poor countries.
  2. The opposite is true. The export of patented drugs to the developing world has little or no effect on the most widespread and urgent health problems it faces, such as malnutrition, immune deficiencies triggering susceptibility to infectious diseases, and other nutritional deficiency-related diseases.
  3. While the health benefits of the multi-billion-dollar drug exports to the developing world are limited, they have clear long-term economic and social consequences: they systematically drain the already scarce economic resources of these countries and deprive them of the opportunity of economic development and of a dignified life for its people.
  4. A network of lobbyists in the media, medicine and politics plays an essential role in this strategy by deceptively portraying ‘Western’ medicine as the only science-based form of health care. This prevents hundreds of millions of people in these countries from being able to take advantage of the benefits of natural and agricultural-based health approaches.

c. The consequences of pharmaceutical colonialism

While these principles of pharmaceutical colonialism may sound abstract to some, their consequences are obvious.

Put yourself in the shoes…

of a major shareholder or executive of a pharmaceutical multinational. You just learnt that a rapidly mutating virus, the coronavirus, is threatening the health of people in essentially every country of the world. But you also know that with every new virus mutation a new specific vaccine will become necessary. Your drug company holds the patents to such a vaccine and the sales of this merchandise will inevitably increase your ‘bottom line’.

You realize that you can take advantage of these future mutations by producing a potentially unlimited number of vaccines against them. By making the countries of the world dependent on the pharmaceutical industry in this way, you can gradually drain them economically and, as a consequence, bring many of the poorest nations under your complete control.

There are only a few preconditions for this strategic global ‘takeover’ on behalf of corporate interests in this thought model:

  1. You must use the global media you control to maintain the false belief that vaccines are the only solution to ending the current viral pandemic.
  2. You must eliminate any possibility, that non-patentable health approaches are considered as alternatives, or even substitutes for the promotion of your vaccine merchandise. In particular you must publicly discredit the use of vitamins and other micronutrients.
  3. You must seek support for this unscrupulous global vaccine marketing campaign from reputable national and international institutions and organizations – most notably the United Nations.

At this decisive moment in history, it is above all your responsibility, Mr. Secretary General, to point out to the world the grave dangers of pharmaceutical colonialism and its particularly malicious form, which abuses the current coronavirus pandemic as a ‘pretext’.

In this context, this Open Letter has a particular significance by not just criticizing the status quo – but also offering the only science-based strategy to provide sustainable health in even the poorest countries, and, thus, to avoid a fatal spiral of neo-colonial dependency for the great majority of the world’s population.

d. They have done it before: pharmaceutical colonialism under the pretext of fighting the HIV/AIDS pandemic

This isn’t the first time that global human health has been attacked by pharmaceutical interests under the pretext of fighting a pandemic. One particular well-documented example has been the pandemic of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS).

For more than three decades the lobbyists of the pharmaceutical investment business have misled the world’s political decision-takers – especially in the developing countries hardest hit by the HIV/AIDS pandemic – into believing that the only way to fight it would be to spend billions of dollars to import so-called ‘antiviral drugs’.

Neither the politicians nor the people in the countries affected by this pandemic realized that the term ‘antiviral drug’ was just code for selling toxic chemotherapy drugs in the form of tablets. Labeling these drugs correctly as ‘chemotherapy’ would have resulted in them being rejected, of course, because it is well known that these toxic substances damage and eventually destroy the bone marrow – the very site in the human body were the immune cells (leukocytes) are produced.

With this despicable trick, an army of global lobbyists for the pharmaceutical export business became responsible for tens of millions of people who were already suffering from immune deficiencies being given toxic drugs that, instead of improving their immune system, further weakened it, thereby activating AIDS and shortening their lives.

It was not until 2013, one entire generation after the beginning of the pandemic, that the world learnt how the most effective way to delay the development of the immune deficiency disease AIDS was to ensure an optimum intake of micronutrients. The results of a large-scale clinical epidemiological study were published in November 2013 in the Journal of the American Medical Association and concluded:

“This evidence supports the use of specific micronutrient supplementation as an effective intervention in HIV-infected adults in early stages of HIV disease, significantly reducing the risk for disease progression… This reduced risk may translate into delay in the time when the HIV-infected patients experience immune dysfunction and into broader access to HIV treatment in developing countries.”

But the preventive and therapeutic benefits of micronutrients in the fight against the AIDS pandemic was not the only area of medicine where these natural substances proved to be equally effective compared with patented pharmaceutical drugs or even superior.

The pending melt-down of the pharmaceutical investment business

In your speech to the Human Rights Council, you accused corporate interests of using the current pandemic as a ‘pretext’. Corporate greed – or as you called it ‘increasing the bottom line’ – was one of the motives you gave for this public accusation.

While this analysis is not wrong, it is insufficient to explain the global scope and aggressiveness via which an army of lobbyists of the pharmaceutical export business is currently trying to manipulate world opinion to accept vaccines as the only hope for humankind.

1. An explosion of knowledge in science-based natural health

What is at stake for the pharmaceutical investment business is not just the bottom line for a few companies, but the overall survival of its entire multi-trillion-dollar business model.

From analyzing this business model, we know that the greatest threats to its future existence is the competition from non-patentable health approaches, in particular the increasing scientific and clinical evidence for the profound health benefits of micronutrients.

The second decade of the 21st century was characterized by an explosion of scientific publications showing the overwhelming benefits of vitamins and other micronutrients in essentially all areas of medicine. A closer look at the increase in the number of publications on the health benefits of vitamins reveals their strategic threat to the patented drug business.

Total number of scientific studies published globally on the health benefits of vitamins/micronutrients in the prevention and treatment of heart disease/cardiovascular disease (A), cancer (B) and infectious diseases (C). The columns in each graph represent the past four decades (1980 to 1989/1990 to 1999/2000 to 2009/2010 to 2019).

Source: Pubmed.gov/ PMC.

These graphs do not just reflect abstract developments, but are of significance for the health and lives of millions of people worldwide. Here are just two examples of how profoundly this development will affect essentially every human life on this planet:

  • Cardiovascular disease. One of the most widespread forms of cardiovascular disease is heart failure, a thus-far largely unexplained decrease in the pumping function of the heart muscle. Even today, heart failure remains one of the health conditions with the worst prognosis. Most patients die from it within a few years of being diagnosed. Until recently, heart transplant surgery was considered the only option to extend patients’ life expectancy.Now there is abundant scientific and clinical evidence that an optimum supply of micronutrients to patients provides essential bioenergy to billions of heart muscle cells, thereby significantly improving this health condition. Thus, having shortened the lives of tens of millions of people over recent decades, micronutrient deficiency has been identified as one of the primary causes of heart failure. This opens up the possibility of significantly reducing the frequency of this health condition in the future.
  • Cancer. In 2017, groundbreaking scientific publications documented that vitamin C is essential for the production of healthy white blood cells (leukocytes). In turn, a chronic deficiency of this vitamin significantly increases the chances of these cells being overproduced in an immature and dysfunctional form – a condition known as leukemia. Optimum amounts of vitamin C were able to prevent this type of dysregulation and, thereby, must be considered the decisive preventive and therapeutic approach to this form of cancer, which is particularly widespread among children.Here too, therefore, scientific progress in the field of micronutrient research has essentially identified leukemia – and potentially other forms of cancer – as the result of chronic vitamin deficiency.And these were just two of many examples of recent advances in medicine that were not previously thought possible. The consequences of these developments were not just apparent to a growing number of people, but also to the stakeholders of the pharmaceutical investment business.Before I address the far-reaching consequences of these developments, it is necessary to first provide an explanation as to why this knowledge has only just become available.

2. The liberation of human health

The structure and essential biological functions of most vitamins were discovered almost a century ago and thereafter recognized by several Nobel Prizes. How could it be that the preventive and therapeutic role of these biological molecules – the basic fuel for billions of cells in our body – has remained unexplored for many decades?

This happened primarily for economic reasons. As outlined above, these natural, non-patentable molecules represented a fundamental threat to the pharmaceutical investment business emerging at the turn of the 19th to the 20th century, which entirely depended on the patentability of drugs.

As a precondition for the growth of this investment industry it became necessary for it to build a global army of lobbyists in the media, medicine and politics to eliminate the competition from natural health approaches. Thus, over decades, the primary goal of these lobbyists has been to ensure that the health benefits of vitamins are excluded from medical education, publicly discredited – or even banned by law.

Not surprisingly, the political leaders spearheading a global ban on vitamins and other natural health approaches were the political decision-takers of Germany and other pharmaceutical export countries, many of whom had been brought to power by pharmaceutical interests.

For three full decades, this global ban on vitamin therapies suppressed research and natural health education around the world. Doctors and scientists opposing this suppression were often threatened with disbarment and criminal proceedings. The prevailing psychological climate of fear prevented life-saving research in natural health for decades and, as a consequence, sentenced hundreds of millions of people worldwide to death from preventable diseases.

Eventually, the interests of millions of people, began to prevail. In 1994, US Congress unanimously passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), legislation that allowed science-based natural health information on the prevention and treatment of diseases to be publicized. To millions of people in the US and beyond, this legislation has become known as the ‘Vitamin Freedom Act’.

An effort by politicians from pharmaceutical-exporting countries to reverse this legislation – through the ‘Brussels EU’ at the European level and the Codex Alimentarius commission at the international level – essentially failed. This triggered an explosion of natural health research worldwide, a development that was embraced by a growing number of people worldwide seeking alternatives to pharmaceutical drugs that are often associated with severe side effects.

3. 2020 – a watershed year for the pharmaceutical investment business

The explosion of knowledge about the use of vitamins and other micronutrients in all areas of medicine, culminated in January 2020. That month, the world’s largest cancer research institution, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), publicly advocated the use of high-dose vitamin C in the prevention and therapy of all types of cancer.

This publication marked the turnaround of a century-long blockade of the use of vitamins in fighting cancer. Moreover, it signified nothing less than a declaration of war against pharmaceutical investment interests: the annual sales of chemotherapy and other patented cancer merchandise had crossed the $150 billion mark and had become the single largest product category for this industry.

For stakeholders of the pharmaceutical investment business the consequences of this watershed event were obvious. If they allowed the message that a nonpatentable natural substance, vitamin C, is the key to fighting cancer, this would soon spread to doctors and eventually to the people of the world. The inevitable outcome would be that the pharmaceutical investment business with cancer drugs would implode. Moreover, the health benefits of vitamins and other micronutrients against cancer would cause a domino-effect and eventually also threaten the global markets of patented pharmaceutical drugs for other diseases. This development would guarantee the end of the pharmaceutical investment business.

You are surely aware, that the global chemical, petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries are essentially controlled by the same international investment groups. Already faced with a significant decrease in their oil business owing to increasing environmental awareness and the rise of renewable energies, these groups could not allow another global multi-trillion-dollar market – that of patented drugs – to collapse.

The pending replacement of the global market for synthetic pharmaceutical drugs with science-based natural health approaches became a clear and present threat to every investor, executive and lobbyist of the pharmaceutical investment business anywhere in the world, at the beginning of 2020.

Imagine…

To illustrate the dimension of this threat, anyone can put herself/himself into the shoes of an executive of BAYER at that time. You just learnt that the US government’s National Cancer Institute recommended including high dose vitamin C in the treatment of all types of cancer. Your analysis of what this announcement means for BAYER inevitably includes the more than 150 year old history of your company.

In 1904 the chairman of BAYER declared in a memorandum that the German chemical/pharmaceutical industry was superior to that of all other nations and should essentially dominate the world. A decade later your company decided to help to realize this very goal and became the economic driving force behind World War I and the main supplier of essential war materials. Towards this end, BAYER even contributed its latest invention, mustard gas, as a weapon of chemical warfare and battlefield genocide.

After this first attempt at world conquest had failed. You didn’t give up. You decided to change one atom in the chemical structure of mustard gas by replacing sulfur (S) with nitrogen (N). This would turn a weapon of mass destruction, mustard gas, into the first chemotherapy drug, also known as nitrogen mustard, allegedly for fighting leukemia and other cancers.

From the money you made from the sales of this new chemotherapy drug and other patented chemicals, you formed – together with other German chemical/drug companies – a corporate cartel that by 1925 had already more than 80,000 employees and had become the world’s largest chemical/pharmaceutical company.

Now you prepared for the next attempt at world conquest: in the early 1930s, BAYER, BASF and other German companies became the single largest corporate sponsors of the Nazi party’s rise to power and the technical and logistical preparation to conduct a global conquest. During World War II, your company made billions by supplying almost all essential war-materials to the Nazi army.

After this second attempt at global conquest on behalf of your global business with patented chemicals/drugs had failed, two dozen directors from your cartel corporations where indicted to stand trial at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal. BAYER director Ter Meer was convicted, together with 12 other executives, and sentenced to jail for committing mass murder and other crimes against humanity. With his knowledge, BAYER employees had conducted experiments on innocent inmates of concentration camps to test the company’s new patented drugs and vaccines.

But even this sentence for having committed crimes against humanity was just a slap on the wrist for the BAYER company. Only a few years later, Ter Meer was out of prison and back as chairman of your board.  By that time, the company, again, had become a flagship of post-World War II German industry.

You think back. Over the past half century, your company made sure that protecting and expanding its pharmaceutical export business was the primary goal of all governments of the post-WWII German Federal Republic. Through abusing political structures such as the Brussels EU and the United Nations, as mentioned above, you have turned Germany, once again, into the world’s largest export nation for patented drugs.

You thereby endangered and eventually sacrificed the lives of millions of people by systematically suppressing natural health research and natural health approaches around the world, as part of your global business strategy.

Now, in January 2020, you learn, that all these efforts were in vain. You realize that the decade-long strategy of silencing natural health is collapsing and the world’s leading research institutes are in open conflict with your corporate interests.

You also know that if you do not act now, your entire company, your investors and executives, including the army of lobbyists you maintain in politics, the media and medicine are going to be held legally responsible for directly or indirectly sacrificing the lives of millions of people and inflicting damage in the magnitude of trillions of dollars to essentially all nations over the entire past century.

In this situation you consider your options.

  • You may recognize that – in order to implement a global conquest strategy – you must first control public opinion and society at large in your own country; thus, your stakeholders in politics, media and other sectors must make sure that
    • vaccines are interpreted by the common people as the only hope to end the pandemic
    • pharmaceutical drug companies are being seen as the saviors of mankind,
    • other scientifically proven ways – most notably micronutrients – are being publicly discredited and legally repressed,
    • a psychological climate of fear is being created and maintained among the people in order to make them accept the increasing economic and social disruptions and the systematic curtailing of human rights,
    • towards this end members of the German government strategically plan fear campaigns with the goal to help control society in your corporate interests.
  • You may make plans to participate in the global rollout of patented vaccines, possibly by trying to win global market dominance by combining gene-based vaccines against several virus mutations.
  • You may also benefit from the German government to launch a ‘task force’ with the goal of pushing your forthcoming vaccine merchandise not just in Germany and Europe but – strategically – to the entire world, thereby creating unprecedented global dependencies and accomplishing the ‘world conquest’ that preceding generations of BAYER executives tried to accomplish by military means.
  • And, if all these measures should fail, you may benefit from the buildup of a military threat potential by an Alliance of drug-exporting governments towards countries trying to escape your global business interests and to keep their economic and political independence.

Founded in 1863 Bayer was just the world’s first multinational drug company and the corporate flagship of today’s largest drug-exporting nation. The ‘do or die’-scenario as it presents itself at this very moment in history is, of course, not limited to the BAYER company. What is at stake is the entire future of the globally operating, multi-trillion-dollar pharmaceutical investment business.

Just like in preparation for the last attempt at world conquest by your corporation in the 1930s and 40s you could consider using the almost 400 subsidiaries/consolidated companies of the Bayer group in almost 90 countries of the world to coordinate your next attempt at world conquest under the ‘pretext’ of fighting the pandemic.

4. Do or die for the pharmaceutical investment business

As mentioned above, the pharmaceutical industry is not a naturally grown industry, it was artificially created to invest in diseases as markets for patented synthetic drugs. From the very beginning, it was clear that this industry could only succeed if it strategically suppressed non-patentable natural health alternatives. Towards this end, over almost a century, large financial groups on both sides of the Atlantic have built a strategic dam of information restricting communication of research, education and the implementation of science-based natural health into global healthcare and medicine.

The above-mentioned Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 caused the first major cracks in this strategically erected dam. Despite all efforts to reverse this law, these cracks have continued to widen and – especially over the past decade – a flood of science-based natural health information has reached all areas of medicine and human health.

This growing flood of natural health information has become an existential threat to the artificially created pharmaceutical investment business. For the investors and executives of this business the consequences are clear:

  1. Now that science-based natural alternatives are becoming available for cardiovascular disease, cancer and other widespread diseases, the pharmaceutical industry – and its carefully crafted image as the sole purveyors of human health – will crumble. People around the world will reject taking overpriced synthetic drugs, which are frequently associated with unacceptable side effects, and will instead choose superior, safe and affordable science-based natural health approaches.
  2. This development will inevitably destroy the pharmaceutical drug markets for essentially all major diseases – causing the loss of tens of trillions of dollars in investments and profits over time.
  3. Moreover, stakeholders of the pharmaceutical investment business that are found guilty of endangering human health and the economies of the world will be held liable for their actions in national and international courts of law.

Imagine…

Imagine the wrath and anger:

  • of tens of thousands of parents who saw their children suffer and die from leukemia, a disease that is now known to be largely preventable by vitamin C,
  • of millions of cancer patients – and tens of millions of relatives of patients who have died from cancer – who learn that micronutrients have been known for decades to protect cells from becoming cancerous, and that they could have spared the lives of most of these patients,
  • of hundreds of millions of patients have suffered a heart attack, stroke, or other forms of atherosclerotic disease, when they learn that these potentially fatal diseases are primarily caused by vitamin deficiencies, i.e., through similar mechanisms to the sailors’ disease scurvy, and could have been largely preventable decades ago,
  • of hundreds of millions of people when they realize that they were deliberately deprived of lifesaving health information for one reason only: to allow diseases to emerge and expand as global markets for the pharmaceutical investment industry.

Such a foreseeable development would have only one parallel in history: half a millennium ago, the people of Europe and later other continents realized that they had been kept in deliberate illiteracy for centuries for the sole purpose of feeding the insatiable greed of its powerful rulers in the medieval feudal system.

Facing a similar existential threat to their global multi-trillion-dollar interests, the pharmaceutical investment groups today and its army of lobbyists in politics, the media, and medicine are united in a global effort to prevent such a development.

Dictatorship or democracy

The conclusions from this analysis should be obvious to everyone: a business model based on the systematic suppression of life-saving natural health information that shares responsibility for the suffering and death of hundreds of millions of people cannot survive in a democracy.

The entire future of the pharmaceutical investment business is dependent on taking the following decisive steps without delay:

  1. Using any means possible, it must organize its control over society by trying to turn democracies the world over into corporate dictatorships. This includes the use of disinformation, economic and political pressure, and – if need be – even military threats.
  2. In order to make this dictatorial rule acceptable to the people, it must pass enabling laws that give these interest groups direct access to political executive power, without any interference by parliaments or other democratically elected bodies.
  3. Since no society would voluntarily agree to democratic powers being given to a group of corporate interests, the lobbyists of this industry need to find a ‘pretext’ in order to make tens of millions of people believe it is in their best interest to give up their basic human rights.
  4. A pandemic caused by a viral, bacterial or other infectious disease is a prime scenario to scare millions of people worldwide and offer such a ‘pretext’.

This way, the pharmaceutical investment business would not only be able to continue its dubious business model, but – in a complete reversal of reality – present itself as the savior of humankind and the ‘new gods’ of the 21st century.

This scenario is precisely what the world is currently witnessing and what you, Mr. Guterres, rightly criticized in your recent speech to the Human Rights Council as an obscure agenda behind the current coronavirus pandemic.

Conspiracy or economy

In some regions of the world, especially in Eastern Asia the coronavirus pandemic seemed to have subsided and social life has largely returned to normal. This is – at least in part – thanks to a micronutrient-rich diet from plants and marine food typical for these regions. In contrast, other regions of the world, including large parts of Europe and America are confronted with more and more restrictions that affect every part of economic and social life.

The devastating consequences for small and large businesses and the massive curtailing of fundamental human rights have been shaking the belief systems of millions of people and given rise to confusion and speculation about possible conspiracies of ‘foreign interests’ behind the coronavirus pandemic.

The explanation, however, is much simpler: not some mysterious forces, but massive economic interests are behind this development. What is at stake now is the future of an industry that – already before the advent of the coronavirus vaccine business – had more than one-trillion-dollar annual revenues from the sales of patented drugs, translating to almost three-billion-dollar sales each day.

In the world’s leading drug export nations these interests have invaded and influenced major sections of society from the so-called scientific experts to the media and politics – all of which have over the past decades become professionally or economically dependent on the pharmaceutical investment business. No political party has come to power in these countries without the financial support of these corporate interests. Consequently, now, they are all being called to arms to save these sponsors.

While this is the case in all major drug exporting countries, one country is particularly affected. Germany is the only post-WWII state that has essentially been built around these specific investment interests. The sobering facts are: Germany, a country that ranks number 63 on the world’s list by size, with few natural resources, has been the world’s number one export nation for decades. It does not take a degree in economics to understand that such a discrepancy can only be explained by the fact that the economic success of this country has been built at the expense of many other nations.

With the export of patented pharmaceuticals being one of the pillars of this economic success, the corporate interests of Germany – and its political stakeholders – have been responsible for promoting the ‘investment business with disease’ across our planet. For decades now, the physical and economic misery of hundreds of millions of people worldwide has been a major factor in thriving the German economy.

Thus, wherever political representatives of Germany today express their opinion, whether within the United Nations, the European Union or other international bodies, everywhere they essentially serve these corporate interests. As mentioned before, a preferred way for these interests to operate is to actually hide their economic interests behind the façade of these international bodies.

Explaining the coronavirus pandemic in future history books

All phenomena currently witnessed by humankind and associated with the coronavirus pandemic can now be logically explained. These include:

  • the passing of enabling or empowerment laws
  • the corrupting of economies
  • the destruction of social life
  • the curtailing of human rights
  • the disruption of adequate social development of an entire generation of children
  • the promotion of the fallacy of the drug industry as savior of mankind.

In time, current events around the coronavirus pandemic will be the subject of history lessons in the schools of the world. They will be characterized as follows:

  1. The pharmaceutical industry is not a naturally grown industry, but an investment business thriving on patentable synthetic drugs. Life-saving biological molecules – including vitamins and other micronutrients – that, among other benefits, strengthen the immune system, are an existential threat to this business model and, therefore, have to be suppressed.
  2. The systematic suppression of information about the health benefits of micronutrients by a global army of pharmaceutical lobbyists has left the immune system of the world’s population susceptible to a multitude of infectious diseases.
  3. Covid-19 and the associated coronavirus pandemic are a direct result of this strategic suppression of information about vitamins and other micronutrients.
  4. This conclusion has been scientifically confirmed by the fact that micronutrients are able to essentially block all key mechanisms of coronavirus infections of the human body.

The corporate and political stakeholders responsible for depriving millions of people of an optimum immune system and exposing them to preventable infections and pandemics must be held directly responsible, in order to prevent them from doing further harm to future generations.

Why

The United Nations, you as its Secretary-General, every political decision taker in the world – in fact every person – requires a convincing reason to act. If the arguments of this Open Letter were not sufficient to convince you to act, Mr. Guterres, I’ll give you my reasons why I decided to share this information with the entire world:

  1. I am doing so because I was privileged to continue the lifework of a two-time Noble Laureate and pioneer in micronutrient research and, together with my colleagues, could create the opportunity for mankind to end the coronavirus pandemic by effective, safe and sustainable natural means – thereby helping to save millions of lives.
  2. I am also doing this as a citizen of Germany. My grandfather’s generation was sent out to conquer the world on behalf of a German Emperor. Subsequently, my father’s generation was sent out to conquer the world on behalf of an German-dominated ‘Thousand-Year Reich’. No one told these generations that both, the Emperors and the subsequent Nazi leaders, were merely political puppets carrying out the global conquest plans of the world’s largest pharmaceutical/chemical multinationals at that time.
  3. I am writing this Open Letter as a citizen of the world. During two world wars, almost 100 million lives were sacrificed to the global conquest attempts by the German pharmaceutical/chemical investment business and its political lackeys. It is time to make sure that the crimes against humanity committed during the past century by German corporate interests are not continued in this and future generations.
  4. I am making this information public to also give an answer to the decisive question: could these two world wars have been prevented? The answer is ‘yes’– under two conditions:
    • The giant economic interests behind these human catastrophes are masters of deception and operate behind ‘pretexts’ – so their economic motives are not recognized by the people at large. Public exposure of these economic interests is a first precondition to prevent such catastrophes in the future.
    • Those who were able to see corporate greed as the driving force behind these two world wars were not strong or courageous enough to speak out. Thus, by publicly speaking out and acting globally, can the people of the world ultimately prevent such catastrophes from happening again.
  5. In am writing this letter as a medical doctor who, through his lifetime, has witnessed hundreds of millions of citizens all over the world die – decades too early – not just from immune deficiencies, but also from cardiovascular disease and other diseases that could have been largely prevented, had the life-saving information about the health benefits of micronutrients not been strategically suppressed on behalf of the pharmaceutical investment business.
  6. Now, instead of spreading the life-saving information about the role of micronutrients in strengthening the human immune system and, specifically, in fighting the coronavirus pandemic, hundreds of millions of lives worldwide are being exposed to ever new mutations of the coronavirus and to vaccines of which the mid- and long-term side effects are entirely unknown.

In summary, I am providing this information to the world to prevent the continuation of the genocides committed on behalf of corporate interests – including those that are committed under the ‘pretext’ of fighting a pandemic. For if we do not bring up the courage to expose the corporate interests now and we do not name their political stakeholders, these genocides will continue and feed on generations to come.

Securing the future of mankind

Humankind stands at a crossroads. The current crisis poses a unique opportunity for all humankind to

  • find new, effective and safe ways to end the current pandemic,
  • learn how to prevent such developments in the future – through a thorough analysis of the roots of the current crisis,
  • pave the way for a ‘world without disease’ – created for the people and by the people.

The role of the United Nations

  • The United Nations is the largest political body in the world. It carries a major responsibility to help to end the current global crisis.Towards this goal, I have shared with you comprehensive scientific knowledge about new, effective approaches for ending the coronavirus pandemic. These approaches are safe and can be implemented immediately anywhere in the world. I am urging you to make this life-saving information available to all member states of the United Nations without delay.For the almost 200 developing and threshold countries, this letter presents the only viable strategy for successfully fighting the current pandemic and preventing future ones. This goal can be achieved without such countries subjugating themselves to a fateful dependency on pharmaceutical colonialism.
  • The United Nations has undertaken various initiatives to fight hunger, malnutrition and diseases, particularly in the developing world. These noble objectives have also been defined as UN ‘Millennium Development Goals’, but they have never been reached. The WHO and FAO have organized regional and international conferences to improve agricultural and nutritional initiatives, but hunger and malnutrition are still rampant across our planet. A full two decades ago, vitamin and mineral deficiency was reported by the international Vitamin and Mineral Deficiency initiative, but despite the collaboration of UNICEF, little has changed since.The scientific identification of malnutrition, and specifically micronutrient deficiency as a precondition for the coronavirus pandemic, presents a unique opportunity for the United Nations to take the lead in an international effort to improve human health and to prevent diseases. Such a program can immediately be implemented anywhere in the world – including the most remote villages of our planet.

The role of the people of the world

The most important role in ending the current pandemic is that of the people of the world themselves. To achieve this goal, everything should be done to harness human potential. One doesn’t need to be a doctor or trained health professional – everyone can understand:

  1. The role of vitamins and other micronutrients as essential catalysts for the metabolism of each cell, particularly the white blood cells (leukocytes) responsible for the defense against viral infections and other invading microorganisms.
  2. That these bioactive molecules are derived from plants, and the knowledge about which of these plants are particularly rich in protective micronutrients should be promoted in every educational institution from kindergarten to public lectures in senior homes.
  3. That the optimum daily intake of these micronutrient-rich fruits and vegetables is an effective and safe way to improve our immune systems and prevent infections.
  4. That an optimum immune system helps to protect the human body against all subtypes of the coronavirus, and that an optimum micronutrient supply as a public health strategy helps to guard against all current and future mutations of the coronavirus.
  5. That since an optimized immune system is also effective against the invasion of our body by other microorganisms, enriching our daily diet with vitamins and other micronutrients is the most effective natural way to prevent future pandemics in general.

The Alma Ata Declaration 1978 by the World Health Organization stated that ‘Health for All’ worldwide can only be achieved by focusing on prevention and – at the same time – making sure that not just health professionals, but all people, get involved in sharing responsibility for personal and community health. The current crisis calls for the implementation of these principles. Everyone can understand, and everyone can take part!

The most urgent global political tasks:

Making science-based natural health a human right.

Considering the century-long strategic suppression of information about the health benefits of vitamins and other science-based natural health approaches, the next goal is clear: to make free access to science-based natural health approaches a human right. Declaring this a fundamental human right, adding it to the human rights charter of the United Nations and making it binding law in all member countries of the UN, is the only way to protect this and future generations from suffering pandemics and other fatal health consequences.

Nutrition-based health and agricultural-based medicine as the basis of effective preventive healthcare.

The explosion of natural health research during the past decades has consistently shown that plant-derived biological molecules are equal – and in many cases superior – to synthetic pharmaceutical drugs. Moreover, unlike patented synthetic drugs, these natural molecules are safe. Scientific and clinical research establishing the health benefits of micronutrients has reached essentially all disciplines of medicine. Thus, despite some resistance from the status quo, nutrition-based health and plant-derived medicine already today represents the future basis of preventive healthcare.

The artificial wall between food and medicines, created by the pharmaceutical investment business to protect its global markets with patented drugs, will fall. Medicine will fully embrace plant-derived natural molecules, essential for optimum cellular metabolism and, thereby, prevent diseases. Agriculture at large will no longer just focus on providing food for the people of the world in order to prevent basic hunger. Farmers around the world will become purveyors of modern medicine by growing plants with proven health benefits, on an industrial scale.

The close connection between plant-derived micronutrients, optimum cellular function and the prevention of diseases will become an essential topic at every level of education. School and community gardens will be established in every city, town and village on this planet.

Such local gardening initiatives will become the cornerstone of a globally effective preventive health care. For the entire developing world, this strategy will be the only way to deliver effective, safe, affordable and sustainable health to hundreds of millions of people living in these parts of the world. For the United Nations this path will be the only reasonable way to fulfill its promise made to the world decades ago of providing ‘Health for All‘.

Above all, this avenue will allow the United Nations to reach the ultimate goal for which it was founded three quarters of a century ago: to close the gap between poor and rich countries in relation to the most basic needs of life, to enable hundreds of millions of people living in underprivileged conditions today to finally be able to live a dignified life – and, thus, make a decisive contribution to the preservation of world peace.

The ‘Movement of Life’ project

The purpose of gardening initiatives is to educate the children as well as the community members of the world about the health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Children in any country of the world can learn about the health benefits of fruits and vegetables in the classrooms and also plant them in school gardens.

For this very purpose, our foundation has launched the Movement of Life project in Africa. Schoolchildren of all ages learn about the health benefits of locally grown fruits and vegetables, plan and maintain school gardens through ‘student health parliaments’, inspire community gardening in the remote villages where their families live and help to improve the health of entire regions. Details of these programs are available at www.movement-of-life.org. This successful initiative can serve as a pilot project for the United Nations and should be extended to all nations without delay.

Pilot project ‘Towards a World Without Disease’. Global health care is turning from a concept of ’repair’ towards the prevention of diseases. Plant-derived micronutrients form the scientific basis of preventive health care and, therefore, are a precondition for the elimination of many diseases in the future. The much-proclaimed goal of the United Nations of ‘Health for All’ comes within reach. Most importantly, reaching this noble goal depends on the participation of all people, young and old, rich and poor. The Movement of Life natural health education project encourages the establishment of student health parliaments, and the launch of school and community gardens across the developing world. This project could function as a pilot project for the schools and communities of the world and eventually unite all mankind ‘Towards a World Without Disease’.

Summary

I call upon you, as Secretary-General of the United Nations, to

  1. Officially inform the member countries of the United Nations about the role of micronutrients as the only effective, safe, affordable and globally available answer to the current pandemic.
  2. Propose a global education program bringing the comprehensive health benefits of micronutrient-rich fruits and vegetables to the schools and communities of the world.
  3. Via the UN support a global campaign titled ‘Towards a World Without Disease’, with the goal to help to prevent diseases by spreading knowledge about the health benefits of micronutrients. This campaign will be carried by scientists, politicians, community leaders and – above all – by responsible citizens worldwide.
  4. Dedicate the UN General Assembly 2021 to supporting such a global campaign with the goal of ending the abuse of the current pandemic as a ‘pretext’ for pharmaceutical colonialism. Such a campaign will ultimately enable all humankind to make a giant step forward towards actually eliminating hunger, malnutrition and many diseases, and, thereby, create a planet that welcomes future generations with dignity.

To make sure that this goal is reached in the foreseeable future, I call upon every citizen anywhere in the world to join in a global effort towards a world without disease!

Links:

  1. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2021/01/linus-pauling/
  2. https://drrathresearch.org/
  3. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/22/world-faces-pandemic-human-rights-abuses-covid-19- antonio-guterres
  4. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2008/10/what-the-arv-defendants-dont-want-you-to-know-about-arvs-6/
  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=vitamin+AND+immune
  6. https://www.unicef.org/media/files/davos_micronutrient.pdf
  7. https://news.un.org/en/audio/2017/02/623922
  8. https://wwjcmnh.org/effective-and-safe-global-public-health-strategy-to-fight-the-covid-19-pandemic-specific- micronutrient-composition-inhibits-coronavirus-cell-entry-receptor-ace2-expression/
  9. https://www.jcmnh.org/micronutrient-combination-inhibits-two-key-steps-of-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-infection-viral- binding-to-ace2-receptor-and-its-cellular-expression/
  10. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Published-ACE2-Vit-C-others-21621.pdf
  11. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-52778/v2
  12. https://documents.pub/document/rockefeller-medicine-men.html
  13. http://www.profit-over-life.org/books/books.php?book=45
  14. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2007/05/the-history-of-the-pharma-cartel/
  15. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2008/01/codex-alimentarius-the-control-and-denial-of-science/
  16. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2006/10/codex-what-is-it-and-how-does-it-affect-you-and-your-health/
  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL8jPMtAVg0
  18. http://www.profit-over-life.org/
  19. http://www.profit-over-life.org/guide/index_892.html
  20. http://www.profit-over-life.org/books/books.php?book=43
  21. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2006/09/roots-of-brussels-eu/
  22. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2016/06/the-hidden-nazi-background-of-walter-hallstein-founding-president-of-the- brussels-eu-commission/
  23. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/multilateralism-for-the-masses-by-emmanuel-macron-et-al-2020-02? barrier=accesspaylog
  24. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/END_AIDS_Chapter07.pdf
  25. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2017/11/end-aids/
  26. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1785464
  27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=vitamin+AND+heart
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28823558/
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28825709/
  30. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-bill/784
  31. https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/ras/ras-central/blog/2020/yun-cantley-vitamin-c
  32. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-coronavirus-borders-idUSKBN23H1D3
  33. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2020/20200409-federal-government-fosters-and-boots- production-of-medical-personal-protection-equipment.html
  34. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_175663.htm
  35. https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/fsr-chemie/igfarben/files/IG_Farben_Reader.pdf#page=33
  36. https://www.bayer.com/en/worldwide/bayer-worldwide
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28825709/
  38. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2018/08/victory-over-cancer/
  39. https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2018/07/why-animals-dont-get-heart-attacks-but-people-do/
  40. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GZlKxrmdyA
  41. https://www.unicef.org/media/files/vmd.pdf
  42. https://www.euro.who.int/ data/assets/pdf_file/0009/113877/E93944.pdf
  43. https://www.movement-of-life.org/

If you want to support the goals of this letter, you may